RFC: turned away at the lobby at street 392 corner street 71

What the team found

RFC publishes No 19, street 392 corner street 71, Beoung Keng Kang I, Khan Chamkarmon, Phnom Penh, Cambodia as its office. The address is in Phnom Penh. Nothing outside carried the company's name, and the building's security turned the team away at the lobby without confirming whether the company is a tenant.

Being refused at the desk is common in a managed building and is not evidence either way. It does mean nobody would confirm that RFC is there, and nothing visible from the street does either.

The checks

The checks that decided this outcome, from the visit checklist.

What Phnom Penh looks like across the set

Phnom Penh accounts for 13 of the addresses the team has visited. Across the 12 other visits to the city, the team confirmed an office twice and could not get access 10 times.

The reports either side of this one in Phnom Penh are ALPHA GOLD FUTURES, Aronex and ASKAP, and reading two or three together is usually more telling than any single visit.

Reading the checks together

In short, the building was the one the address names, there was no sign for the company outside and reception could not say either way. No single check settles an outcome on its own, which is why each one is listed above rather than folded into a verdict.

What this outcome means

Access restricted. Building or security restrictions prevented the researcher from completing the planned checks.

A field survey confirms only what was observed at the stated address and time. It does not verify regulatory status, client-money handling, trading conditions or financial strength. The photographs are the team's own, taken at the location on the day, and may be cropped for privacy. Read how surveys are conducted.

If you represent RFC and believe this report is wrong, send a response and it will be published beside the report.